IN BRIEF: N.Y. jeweler not covered for fake J-Lo video mob heist

Trade news

Moderators: PinkDiamond, John

Post Reply
User avatar
PinkDiamond
Posts: 15652
Joined: Thu Jun 04, 2015 9:30 pm
Location: Ozark Mountains

IN BRIEF: N.Y. jeweler not covered for fake J-Lo video mob heist

Post by PinkDiamond »

Oh good grief, one thing you can count on with insurance companies is that they put so many loopholes in their contracts it's a wonder anyone who makes a claim can ever get remuneration. This jeweler was duped by a mobster serving time in prison, and Lloyd's of London says he's not covered so he's SOL on getting his jewels back or being compensated for the loss, so I hope he stops paying their premiums and goes with another company. Here's what happened, and why they claim he's not covered. :?

IN BRIEF: N.Y. jeweler not covered for fake J-Lo video mob heist
Reuters

"Lloyd’s London has no duty to compensate Crown Jewels Estate Jewelry Inc for the $2 million in merchandise it loaned to a “music-video producer” who turned out to be a member of the Gambino crime syndicate orchestrating an elaborate scam behind bars, the New York Appellate Division held Thursday.

The court affirmed that Crown triggered the “dishonest entrustment” exclusion to its jewelers block policy in 2017 when it willingly handed over the diamonds to a courier for James Sabatino, who claimed to be shooting a video for Jennifer Lopez.

Crown’s loss “resulted from theft or an act of dishonest character on the part of the persons to whom the jewelry was entrusted,” the court said in an opinion by Justices Dianne Renwick, Sallie Manzanet-Daniels, Tanya Kennedy and Martin Shulman. “It is irrelevant to whom or for what purpose the jewelry was actually or intended to be entrusted.”

According to the opinion, Sabatino had obtained several cell phones while incarcerated in a federal prison in Miami and used them to spoof Sony email addresses and telephone numbers, and to create a website for an ersatz brokerage to issue certificates of insurance on the “borrowed” merchandise.

Other jurisdictions may question whether items given to imposters were truly “entrusted,” but in New York, “entrustment is to be determined by the state of mind of the insured rather than that of the recipient,” the court held. “The plain language of the dishonest entrustment exclusion … confirms that the exclusion applies to the present case.”

The case is Crown Jewels Estate Jewelry Inc v. Underwriters at Interest at Lloyd's London, New York Appellate Division, First Department, No. 2020-04312 (Index 655939/17, Appeal No. 13833) ... "

https://www.reuters.com/business/legal/ ... 021-05-14/
PinkDiamond
ISG Registered Gemologist


· ´¨¨)) -:¦:-¸.·´ .·´¨¨))
((¸¸.·´ ..·´ There are miracles left for you to do .... -:¦:- -:¦:-
-:¦:- ((¸¸.·´* It all begins inside of you. ;)
User avatar
SwordfishMining
Posts: 4276
Joined: Fri Jun 05, 2015 3:06 pm
Location: Denio, NV USA
Contact:

Re: IN BRIEF: N.Y. jeweler not covered for fake J-Lo video mob heist

Post by SwordfishMining »

No memo sale is secure.
I'll jump over my shadow. https://www.virginvalleyopal.com"
Opals & more at my ESTY store https://swordfishmining.etsy.com"
Post Reply