Groups Dispute Recycled Gold’s Eco Benefits

Moderators: PinkDiamond, John

Post Reply
User avatar
PinkDiamond
Posts: 15734
Joined: Thu Jun 04, 2015 9:30 pm
Location: Ozark Mountains

Groups Dispute Recycled Gold’s Eco Benefits

Post by PinkDiamond »

If you ask me, although you haven't :lol: , I don't think they ought to be assigning carbon footprint numbers to recycled gold unless they know exactly where it came from. Otherwise they're just pulling numbers out of thin air because they have no idea where it came from so why they're allowed to make such claims at all doesn't seem right to me. That's not the only issue with it either so check this out. :?

Groups Dispute Recycled Gold’s Eco Benefits
By Rob Bates | May 01, 2024

Image

"A long list of nongovernmental organizations and eco-minded industry groups have signed an “open letter” that says gold currently billed as “recycled” does not have the advertised environmental benefits.

“The term ‘recycled’…falsely implies to consumers that using such gold has a decisive positive social and environmental impact, and deserves to be called eco-friendly, ethical and responsible,” said the letter, addressed to the International Organization for Standardization (ISO), the London Bullion Market Association (LBMA), the Responsible Jewellery Council, and the Responsible Minerals Initiative.

According to the letter, “recycled” has historically been reserved for materials that are discarded, which gold generally is not.

“Under today’s definitions, once a piece of old jewelry or manufacturing scrap has been reprocessed into fine gold, a business-as-usual practice as old as the world, it benefits from a green image and a zero-carbon footprint,” said the letter.

But that’s not necessarily merited, as “recycled” gold can come from mines with a high carbon footprint, it said.

The signees called upon “all companies and consumer-facing brands to disclose the methodology used to calculate their gold carbon footprint and align it with independent scientific research.”

They also contended that due diligence requirements for recycled gold are lax.

“This creates loopholes that are exploited to introduce problematic gold into legitimate supply chains. This includes gold linked to conflict, organized crime, money laundering, tax evasion, and child labor, or to sanctioned Russian individuals or companies. Research has shown that refineries certified to best practice standards have carried out their due diligence for ‘recycled’ gold only until the first supplier, without knowing where this gold reenters the market and the risk associated.”

Furthermore, the letter asserted that companies selling only recycled gold do so at the expense of the artisanal and small-scale mining (ASM) sector, which is contrary to the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) recommendations.

“Mining is vital to the livelihoods of around 100 million people worldwide,” the letter said. “Not engaging with ASM is likely the biggest missed opportunity for gold supply chains to ... "

https://www.jckonline.com/editorial-art ... -benefits/
PinkDiamond
ISG Registered Gemologist


· ´¨¨)) -:¦:-¸.·´ .·´¨¨))
((¸¸.·´ ..·´ There are miracles left for you to do .... -:¦:- -:¦:-
-:¦:- ((¸¸.·´* It all begins inside of you. ;)
Post Reply