NO RELIABLE STUDIES OF CLIMATE CHANGE WITHOUT HENRY’S LAW

[SwordfishMining]

This PDF explains actual science: NO RELIABLE STUDIES OF CLIMATE CHANGE WITHOUT HENRY’S LAW AND A NEW THERMOMETER FOR THE GLOBAL TEMPERATURE by JYRKI KAUPPINEN AND PEKKA MALMI

Conclusion (7.)
In an equilibrium, Henry’s Law is very trivial and we do not need to calculate any convolutions. But, if the climate is out of the equilibrium, then we have to apply the unit impulse response via convolution in order to describe concentrations as a function of time. Right now, our climate is substantially out of balance, because of the big human CO2 release and the change of low cloud cover. In this situation, we must use our theory to study climate change.

Nature convolves the true temperature ∆T (t) by αI(t). The convolution is pe(t) the CO2 concentration emitted to the atmosphere. According to Eq. (7),
deconvolution back is very simple ∆T (t) = (pe(t) + τ dpe(t)/dt)/α. In other words, in deconvolution we search for the temperature the convolution of which is pe(t). This is a very useful result, which we are able to use as a new thermometer for global temperature.

The theory is exact, but only noise or errors in the measured ∆Tm(t), pm(t), and ph(t) limit the accuracy of this method. Note that the method does not
depend on the cause of the temperature change. The results of this work confirm our earlier studies about climate change [7, 18, 19, 20]. Since 1970, according to the observations, the changes of the low cloud cover have caused practically the observed temperature changes [18, 19, 20, 21]. The low cloud cover has gradually decreased starting in 1975.

The human contribution was about 0.01◦C in 1980 and now it is close 0.03◦C.

https://arxiv.org/pdf/2304.01245.pdf