The Mystery of Why So Many Lifelong Smokers Never Get Lung Cancer May Be Solved

Share your health tips, tricks, and stories here

Moderators: PinkDiamond, John

Post Reply
User avatar
PinkDiamond
Posts: 15605
Joined: Thu Jun 04, 2015 9:30 pm
Location: Ozark Mountains

The Mystery of Why So Many Lifelong Smokers Never Get Lung Cancer May Be Solved

Post by PinkDiamond »

The question of why some people who smoke occasionally, those who quit years ago, or even those who have never smoked get lung cancer, while others who are lifelong heavy smokers do not has baffled scientists for years, and now they may have finally found the answer. :)

Image

The Mystery of Why So Many Lifelong Smokers Never Get Lung Cancer May Be Solved

CARLY CASSELLA 26 MAY 2022

Smoking cigarettes is the number one risk factor for lung cancer, with tobacco products causing up to 90 percent of lung cancer deaths in the United States.

Without a doubt, the safest way to protect yourself against lung cancer is to avoid smoking cigarettes, and yet, at the same time, it's also true that not all lifelong smokers are doomed to develop cancer.

In fact, the vast majority don't. Scientists have long wondered why, and a new study adds weight to the idea that genetics has a role to play.

Among people who smoke but never develop lung cancer, researchers found an inherent advantage. The cells that line their lungs appear to be less likely to mutate over time.

The findings suggest that DNA repair genes are more active among some individuals, which can protect against cancers arising, even when cigarettes are regularly smoked.

The study made use of genetic profiles taken from the bronchi of 14 never-smokers and 19 light, moderate, and heavy smokers.

Surface cells collected from the lungs of the participants were sequenced individually to measure mutations in their genomes.

"These lung cells survive for years, even decades, and thus can accumulate mutations with both age and smoking," explains epidemiologist and pulmonologist Simon Spivack from the Albert Einstein College of Medicine.

"Of all the lung's cell types, these are among the most likely to become cancerous."

According to the authors, the findings "unequivocally demonstrate" that mutations in the human lung increase with natural age, and among smokers, the DNA damage is even more significant.

Tobacco smoke has long been associated with triggering DNA damage in the lung, but the new study found not all smokers are in the same boat.

While the amount that someone smoked was linked to an increase in cell mutation rates, after the equivalent of about 23 years of smoking a pack a day, that risk plateaus.

"The heaviest smokers did not have the highest mutation burden," says Spivack.

"Our data suggest that these individuals may have survived for so long in spite of their heavy smoking because they managed to suppress further mutation accumulation. This leveling off of mutations could stem from these people having very proficient systems for repairing DNA damage or detoxifying cigarette smoke."

The findings could help explain why 80 to 90 percent of lifelong smokers never develop lung cancer. It could also help explain why some people who never smoke at all do develop the tumors.

While toxic tobacco smoke seems to trigger extra cell mutations in the lung, whether these mutations develop into tumors is dependent on how well the body can repair DNA or reduce DNA damage.

Genes concerned with DNA repair can be inherited or acquired, and the silencing of repair genes has been associated with tumor development in previous research.

Genes aren't the only factors influencing a person's cancer risk. Environmental factors like diet can also influence nutrients in the body that impact tumor development.

What makes an individual's body better at repairing DNA is ... "

https://www.sciencealert.com/we-re-clos ... ung-cancer
PinkDiamond
ISG Registered Gemologist


· ´¨¨)) -:¦:-¸.·´ .·´¨¨))
((¸¸.·´ ..·´ There are miracles left for you to do .... -:¦:- -:¦:-
-:¦:- ((¸¸.·´* It all begins inside of you. ;)
User avatar
SwordfishMining
Posts: 4264
Joined: Fri Jun 05, 2015 3:06 pm
Location: Denio, NV USA
Contact:

Re: The Mystery of Why So Many Lifelong Smokers Never Get Lung Cancer May Be Solved

Post by SwordfishMining »

When I was young I saw a American Cancer Society special hosted by Tony Curtis. In it he was describing the mice they used for their studies. They took all the white mice and gave them a skin cancer cell and the ones that did NOT develop a tumor were NOT used in cancer rate studies.
90% of the mice would not catch cancer easy? In any case. They only used the 10% of the mice they knew could catch cancer to test things to see if they would get sick as the other 90% basically had a genetic makeup that dealt with the pollutant.
Then they used mice bred for the fact they could catch cancers to make the trials easy and fast.
I'll jump over my shadow. https://www.virginvalleyopal.com"
Opals & more at my ESTY store https://swordfishmining.etsy.com"
crazy8s
Posts: 1801
Joined: Fri Jun 05, 2015 1:10 pm
Location: farm country Calif

Re: The Mystery of Why So Many Lifelong Smokers Never Get Lung Cancer May Be Solved

Post by crazy8s »

Not suprising.
Post Reply