WIN for your rights and health! Landmark Seventh Circuit Decision Says Fourth Amendment Applies to Smart Meter Data

Share your health tips, tricks, and stories here

Moderators: PinkDiamond, John

Post Reply
User avatar
PinkDiamond
Posts: 15411
Joined: Thu Jun 04, 2015 9:30 pm
Location: Ozark Mountains

WIN for your rights and health! Landmark Seventh Circuit Decision Says Fourth Amendment Applies to Smart Meter Data

Post by PinkDiamond »

Sweet! There are two benefits from this ruling; actually, three. Your 4th amendment rights will be protected, as well as your health from the radiation these things emit that we weren't given any choice about having installed on our homes. There's even evidence of them spontaneously combusting and people losing their homes. :o

Of course they will appeal it, but the 7th District court is seldom overturned, so stay tuned for any followup, and be sure to make them give you the old analog style meter back again to protect your health. We are bombarded with radiation from so many sources today, that weren't around a century ago, and the effects are detrimental to both the young and the old, as we see peoples' health deteriorate from otherwise 'unknown invisible causes'. We already know that it affects the brains of children from the time they're in the womb, so it may take longer to have the same effect on a grownup, but constant exposure adds up; especially if you live within a certain number of miles of the antennas.

Don't take chances with your and your family's health. Eliminate as many sources of radiation from your environment as possible. ;)

There are sub-links in the story to further information and court documents at the link.

WIN! Landmark Seventh Circuit Decision Says Fourth Amendment Applies to Smart Meter Data

Image
Written By: Jamie Williams August 25, 2018
A major Appeals Court has ruled that Smart Meters violate your protection of illegal search and seizure under the Fourth Amendment. Depending on what citizens around the nation do with this ruling, it could potentially send Technocracy back into the last century where it belongs.

The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.” – Fourth Amendment, U.S. Constitution ⁃ TN Editor

"The Seventh Circuit just handed down a landmark opinion, ruling 3-0 that the Fourth Amendment protects energy-consumption data collected by smart meters. Smart meters collect energy usage data at high frequencies—typically every 5, 15, or 30 minutes—and therefore know exactly how much electricity is being used, and when, in any given household. The court recognized that data from these devices reveals intimate details about what’s going on inside the home that would otherwise be unavailable to the government without a physical search. The court held that residents have a reasonable expectation of privacy in this data and that the government’s access of it constitutes a “search.”

This case, Naperville Smart Meter Awareness v. City of Naperville, is the first case addressing whether the Fourth Amendment protects smart meter data. Courts have in the past held that the Fourth Amendment does not protect monthly energy usage readings from traditional, analog energy meters, the predecessors to smart meters. The lower court in this case applied that precedent to conclude that smart meter data, too, was unprotected as a matter of law. On appeal, EFF and Privacy International filed an amicus brief urging the Seventh Circuit to reconsider this dangerous ruling. And in its decision, released last week, the Seventh Circuit wisely recognized that smart meters and analog meters are different:
“Using traditional energy meters, utilities typically collect monthly energy consumption in a single lump figure once per month. By contrast, smart meters record consumption much more frequently, often collecting thousands of readings every month. Due to this frequency, smart meters show both the amount of electricity being used inside a home and when that energy is used.”

The Seventh Circuit recognized that this energy usage data “reveals information about the happenings inside a home.” Individual appliances, the court explained, have distinct energy-consumption patterns or “load signatures.” These load signatures allow you to tell not only when people are home, but what they are doing. The court held that the “ever-accelerating pace of technological development carries serious privacy implications” and that smart meters “are no exception.”

This is critical precedent. ... "

https://www.technocracy.news/win-landma ... eter-data/
PinkDiamond
ISG Registered Gemologist


· ´¨¨)) -:¦:-¸.·´ .·´¨¨))
((¸¸.·´ ..·´ There are miracles left for you to do .... -:¦:- -:¦:-
-:¦:- ((¸¸.·´* It all begins inside of you. ;)
Artfldgr
Posts: 399
Joined: Mon Jun 08, 2015 1:46 pm

Re: WIN for your rights and health! Landmark Seventh Circuit Decision Says Fourth Amendment Applies to Smart Meter Data

Post by Artfldgr »

The energy levels for all physical processes at the atomic and molecular levels are quantized, and if there are no available quantized energy levels with spacings which match the quantum energy of the incident radiation, then the material will be transparent to that radiation, and it will pass through. If electromagnetic energy is absorbed, but cannot eject electrons from the atoms of the material, then it is classified as non-ionizing radiation, and will typically just heat the material.


if anyone is interested...

The interaction of microwaves with matter other than metallic conductors will be to rotate molecules and produce heat as result of that molecular motion. Conductors will strongly absorb microwaves and any lower frequencies because they will cause electric currents which will heat the material. Most matter, including the human body, is largely transparent to microwaves. High intensity microwaves, as in a microwave oven where they pass back and forth through the food millions of times, will heat the material by producing molecular rotations and torsions. Since the quantum energies are a million times lower than those of x-rays, they cannot produce ionization



Absorption of EM radiation
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9j0wzvA84SM

How molecules absorb infra-red radiation
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-8OvYZzLZqk

its edumacation...
Artfldgr
Posts: 399
Joined: Mon Jun 08, 2015 1:46 pm

Re: WIN for your rights and health! Landmark Seventh Circuit Decision Says Fourth Amendment Applies to Smart Meter Data

Post by Artfldgr »

oh, and before you say waves have a big effect?
want to see a even BIGGER one?

the effect in the video is huge compared to the same magnetic effect of light on the molecules

Water Electric Dipole and Diamagnetism
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7b-w0oWttN0

a dipole molecule rotating is not like rotating in a macro object
also, if you watched the video in the prior post, you see that infra red doesnt rotate, it actually causes electrons to change their orbits

and if you thought that diamagnetic example was interesting
try this
Paramagnetism and Diamagnetism
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u36QpPvEh2c
User avatar
SwordfishMining
Posts: 4216
Joined: Fri Jun 05, 2015 3:06 pm
Location: Denio, NV USA
Contact:

Re: WIN for your rights and health! Landmark Seventh Circuit Decision Says Fourth Amendment Applies to Smart Meter Data

Post by SwordfishMining »

Thanks for the share art. Gotta go watch those when i get a chance. The just slapped a smart meter on my pole without my notice last week. Glad its 50 ft away from my kitchen, which is the closest end of the house. The router my telphone company gave me fo my DSL has a non working on off wifi button on the front despite the fact the manual online says it works???? Power strip switch cord works LOL.
I'll jump over my shadow. https://www.virginvalleyopal.com"
Opals & more at my ESTY store https://swordfishmining.etsy.com"
Post Reply